Vkontaktovedenie for bad

 After the trio on the exam occurred to her sister friend grimly joked: "If we do not exam in mathematics, and in" vkontaktovedeniyu "give up, I would have received" excellent ". "I have not been handed over to - I assured. - Question number one: how not to look like a fool on your page FaceBook? »

Do not give up. My job - to warn.

For bloggers (sinful), and those who use social networks as a source of income (twice a sinner) account - a mirror of the soul. He will tell us more about you than an x-ray can tell the doctor, love note graphologist and CBC - ghouls with the manners of a gourmet.

However, the "look" and "be" are not synonymous, but only on clothes meet. If the third day according to the status of what we ate gruel useful and how to successfully poop, it does not mean anything, and who has bitten - not the mother, and the echidna. But in peacetime, while childless, know charmer: if we see something from the following on your wall, we think that you - fool. The converse would have to prove.

First and foremost - the "great thoughts of great people," that is to say the quote. Quotes flaunt those who want to seem smarter and intelligent man is unnecessarily. Quote - speculation on someone else's wit in the absence of its own. Quote - the recognition that the book was too lazy to read. Quotes - that's what passengers are treated plasma screens in buses. Quote - it's embarrassing. Almost as embarrassing, how to dance on the bar in a fur coat by Irina Allegrova song "Walk, crazy Empress." And most importantly: quote - a trap for fools. Epic Fail Jane Doe walked around the Internet: for a quote from Erich Maria Remarque was followed by a question - that of the Remarque you read? "Firstly, Remarque - woman, so her name is not inclined ..." - Jane Doe said. Curtain.

Most of all in terms of citations unlucky Faina Ranevskaya. It is believed that the reaction Faina to the news that her statements to the holes on the Easterly blozhikam people of the XXI century, decided to quote only the Tears for Fears. By the way, the cleverest woman of his time never photographed a salad before eating it. Also it is not photographed my coffee, my nails and my shoes. And you?

All that is true for citations is true of "ancient folk wisdom." For all the nations will not answer, but the most popular social networking "Chinese wisdom" I was showing a Chinese friend with philological education. Two-thirds of these wisdoms he saw for the first time, and to declare all Russian idiots prevented him only innate intelligence. And if I said that "Chinese wisdom" always side by side with quotations by authors such as Coelho, Beigbeder and Bach, would not have saved and innate intelligence.

More reliable evidence of stupidity background is in the text or the lack thereof in the head. If you are deeply moved by the film with Keira Knightley and Jude Law in the lead roles, and hastened to inform readers that the film is based on a novel by the great Russian writer Leo Tolstoy, who was born in 1828 in the province of Tula, congratulations, you - fool. Absence backgrounds in my head is not so easy to identify, but if you suddenly told the world that the creators of "The Lord of the Rings" stole part of the plot in "Harry Potter", then - see para. 1.

A separate paragraph are poems subparagraph - poems about women. No worse than to tell the world something like "I am a woman, and therefore I am - a slave. / Poznan salty taste of insults. / I am a woman, and then I - desert, / Which will incinerate you. " Generally, only complete fools within the online communication have focused on their gender ("I, as a woman ..."), for the rest understand that the interlocutor for their gender is obvious. Quite a clinical case - combine these verses and is flirting with the songs, where "over you" rhymes with "Madagascar." If you do not believe that it happens, drive in "Google" "Elena Vaenga."

Come on. If you are under twenty-five, do not argue about the philosophical nature of the relationship between man and woman - no one will believe that you understand this. At such a tender age is also contraindicated arguments about politics and arguments on the topic "Who is the ideal / real man" contraindicated everything and always (we know that an ideal / real woman talk only idiots and virgins). Also avoid arguments about the rich inner world, the cruelty of the outside world, about loneliness in the crowd of butterflies in the stomach, about the weather, but apart from that - with suffixes podsyusyukom. If paradise is still there, and its gates guarded by the apostle Peter, no one can guarantee that the apostle Peter was not grammar-nazi who for the word "greeting! "Send to hell in a pan without the right to pardon.

Now the movie. With a movie it's complicated. This does not explain logically, but the list of favorite movies hopeless fools necessarily the number of "Requiem for a Dream," "The Butterfly Effect", "Mr. Nobody", "Chocolate" and "Amelie", and not in isolation, but en masse. Perhaps because of these good films initially had strategic calculation on fools, because fools love to talk extremely difficult and pointless nice about simple, not to say - primitive. Rose - name, oak - a man, a deer - game, Volga - hockey club, Sparrow - Pirates, chicken - fishing tackle, Bulgaria - an asteroid Russia - hotel - here's a set of platitudes wrapped in foil intrigue. And when the Jesuit approach to style and positioning even turns into toast croutons, while remaining croutons, but that's the lady with a rich inner world croutons disdain, but croutons grind for a sweet soul (which is - again - does not detract from the merits of toast).

What else? "Easy chair, plaid, not pressed the trigger time." However, this is stereotyping. We live in a wonderful century - a century of absolute and final victory of one of the deadly sins of the rest six - in an age of pride. In an age when your food photos, details of your personal life, bows under a palm tree and other people's stolen thoughts are not signs of unhealthy boasting, and socialization.

Previously, for such contempt from school.